Summary of Issue
Things to Consider
Site alteration on agricultural lands generally does not require a municipal permit and may be exempt from site alteration and fill by-laws if considered “normal farm practice”. This allows farmers access to soil for the purposes of agricultural operations, such as drainage or erosion control. Site alteration using excess quantities of soil by agricultural operations may occur for various purposes (e.g., soil amendment, re-establish vegetation, surface drainage). These activities may require a permit from a municipality or could be exempt if considered a normal farm practice. Each situation depends on the specific activity and the applicable municipal site alteration or fill by-law. It is recommended that farmers contact the local municipality to identify applicable fill or site alteration by-laws for the area.
Information on normal farm practices (See Citizens Guide) and the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board is available from OMAFRA.
It should be noted there have also been reports of agricultural lands receiving contaminated soils and/or commercial fill operations attempting to pass as “normal farm practice” to avoid regulation. For example, an operation may claim a site needs to be filled back to grade for agricultural purposes, when this is not always true.
Site Alteration is often defined in By-laws and does not exempt agricultural lands, but is often carefully worded to require compliance with the By-law even if not requiring a Permit. See Township of King’s Rationale document [1]
Short Form References
This page makes reference to:
The “Excess Soil Regulation” which is the short form for the Ontario Regulation 406/19 On-Site and Excess Soil Management made under the Environmental Protection Act.
The “Rules document” which is the short form the reference document to the regulation entitled Rules for Soil Management and Excess Soil Quality Standards
MECP BMP -which is Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks document of Excess Soil – A Guide for Best Management Practices.
Brownfields regulation refers to Ontario Regulation 153/04
Key Takeaways
The Excess Soil Regulation puts the onus on project areas (source sites) to confirm that, among other things, the owner or operator of the reuse site has agreed in writing to accept the excess soil. This applies to all excess soil movements to reuse sites, including agricultural sites; see the Overview of Regulation tab for an overview of the reuse requirements.
In addition to the general requirements that may apply from the Excess Soil Regulation (when excess soil can be reused etc.), the Rules document provides additional requirements that may affect the deposit of excess soil on agricultural lands. A prominent example is:
Excess soil shall only be finally placed for the beneficial purpose of growing crops or pasture if the following criteria are met:
i. no excess soil will be placed on top of existing topsoil unless the excess soil is topsoil; and
ii. the excess soil meets Table 1 of the excess soil quality standards and the results of any required leachate analysis meets Table 1 of the leachate screening levels as outlined in the Appendices in PART II of this document unless the excess soil is finally placed at a depth that is below 1.5 metres from the surface.
See the Guidance document on this website for a general overview of reuse requirements from the Excess Soil Regulation, as well as resources on the ministry’s excess soil webpage (Handling excess soil | Ontario.ca).
Key Resources
For further information, see MECP’s Factsheets (available at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/handling-excess-soil) with an overview of relevant regulatory requirements, best management practices, FAQs and key definitions related to:
Source sites (generally referred to as “project areas” in the Excess Soil Regulation)
Reuse sites
Soil Quality & Beneficial Reuse
Offsite Soil Management – Temporary Soil Storage and Processing
Stormwater Pond Sediment Management
Qualified Persons and Sampling
Infrastructure Projects
Normal Farm Practices Protection Board hearings are summarized here: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onnfppb/
By-law Sections
Exemptions
Things to Consider
Many municipal by-laws include an exemption for “normal farm practices” but exclude fillings in excess of a specified topsoil height or fill volume. However, since “normal farm practice” is defined case by case, it may be most effective not to specify limits. The Township of King’s (proposed) By-law does “restrict site alterations and fill placement that do not align with a carefully considered “need" rather than those driven simply by fill placement for profit (commercial filling”. [2]
Sample Language
“This By-law does not apply to: […]
l) the removal of topsoil as an incidental part of a normal farm practice including such removal as an incidental part of sod-farming, greenhouse operations and nurseries for horticultural products, but this By-law is applicable to the removal of topsoil and removal, placement or replacement of sub-strata for sale, exchange or other disposition;” [3]
A slight amendment to the above, for greater clarity from the Town of Mono:
h) The removal of topsoil as an incidental part of a normal farm practice including such removal as an incidental part of sod-farming, greenhouse operations and nurseries for horticultural products, except for the removal of Topsoil for sale, exchange or other disposition;” [4]
Exception A by-law respecting the removal of topsoil does not apply to the removal of topsoil as an incidental part of a normal agricultural practice including such removal as an incidental part of sod-farming, greenhouse operations and nurseries for horticultural products.
Exclusion The exception in respecting the removal of topsoil as an incidental part of a normal agricultural practice does not include the removal of topsoil for sale, exchange or other disposition. [5]
Things to Consider
Prohibitions related to agricultural lands often address removal and replacement of topsoil. The limit for replacement of topsoil tends to be between 20 and 30 centimeters and between 500 and 1000 cubic metres. Limits on topsoil height and fill volume are typically included to prevent illegal fill operations attempting to pass as normal agricultural practice. However, municipalities should also consider that operations exceeding these limits maybe deemed normal farm practice by the NFP Board. Example prohibition language is provided below.
Sample Language
Removal of topsoil from Agricultural Lands per the Municipal Act, 2001:
“This By-law is not applicable to the following: […] (m) The removal of topsoil from agricultural lands incidental to a normal agricultural practice including such removal as an incidental part of sod farming, greenhouse operations and nurseries for horticultural products. This exception does not include the removal of topsoil for sale, exchange or other disposition;” [6]
Sample Language
Replacement of topsoil on Agricultural Lands:
No fill permit is required for: […]
f) Replacement of topsoil for restoration of agricultural lands used for normal agricultural practices, as an incidental part of sod farming, greenhouse operations, and nurseries for horticultural practices.
Permit Issuance
Things to Consider
If a municipality with a site alternation or fill by-law under the Municipal Act issues a permit for site alteration on farmland, the municipality is responsible for enforcing it. A municipality cannot override the Farming and Food Production Protection Act prohibition on by-laws that restrict an agricultural operation from carrying out a normal farm practice.
It is common for municipal by-laws to exempt projects under the Drainage Act and the Tile Drainage Act as it is necessary to keep infrastructure in a fit state of repair. There may also be other exemptions for activities where the soil typically stays on site. The removal of topsoil as an integral part of a normal farm practice would also be exempt, for example, where it is removed as an incidental part of sod-farming, greenhouse operations and nurseries for horticultural products.
If a permit is not required and there is a complaint that use of excess soil is inappropriate, the issue could go to the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board under the Farming and Food Production Protection Act (after due conflict resolution/mediation process).
For complaints related to normal farm practices, please contact the Agricultural Information Contact Centre at 1-877-424-1300 or by email at ag.info.omafra@ontario.ca.
Sample Language
“Notwithstanding the provisions of section 4(6), above, the Committee may allow a proposed site alteration on rural land to proceed by way of a simple form of application where:
(a) the average depth of topsoil is 20 centimeters or less; or, (b) the placement of topsoil is recommended by a Qualified Professional Agrologist as part of a normal farm practice; and, (c) the applicant carries on an agricultural operation within the meaning of the Farming and Food Production Protection Act, 1998 and provides a farming business registration number within the meaning of the Farm Registration and Farm Organization Funding Act, 1993. [7]
Resources
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) has a fact sheet, “Importation of Soil onto Agricultural Land”, to:
Educate farmers about legal requirements, risks and liabilities;
Support environmentally sustainable practices for importation of soil onto agricultural lands;
Provide technical information and resources to help reduce concerns and conflicts related to soil imported onto agricultural lands; and
Provide information to assist OMAFRA field staff in communicating with farmers about mechanisms available to help protect soil and water resources.
Link: http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/16-055.htm
Sample Language
Municipal requirements for professional agrologist/Certified Crop Advisor reports are provided by some municipalities under the Permit Issuance section. For example:
“To obtain a permit pursuant to this By-law, an applicant shall provide the following information: […]
4.1.10 for site alteration on agricultural lands, a soil fertility report, signed by a professional engineer/soil scientist, confirming that the site alteration will not result in a reduction in the overall soil fertility;” [8]
References
[1] Township of King – Rationale Document. This is a temporary site while the public engagement process is underway. Site Alteration By-law Review | SPEAKING - Your voice, our community. For a permanent location – search www.king.ca
[2] Township of King – Rationale Document LINK
[3] Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury. By-law 2011-108. (https://bradfordwestgwillimbury.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/562?preview=31941)
[4] Town of Mono - By-law 2020-XXXX, a By-law to Regulate Site Alteration and Movement of Fill within the Town of Mono. Town of Mono | Home
[5] King Township – By-law 2021 – XXXX Link to be updated
[6] Township of Uxbridge By-law 2010-084 (http://town.uxbridge.on.ca/sites/default/files/by_laws/Fill%20(Site%20Alteration)%20By-law%20No.%202010-084.pdf)
[7] Town of Halton Hills By-law 2017-0040 Site Alterations - Halton Hills
[8] Town of Markham By-Law 2011-232 (https://www.markham.ca/wps/wcm/connect/markhampublic/d9c29487-be8a-435c-b22d-ce3113e56380/2011-232.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=d9c29487-be8a-435c-b22d-ce3113e56380)